First off, I would like to thank Leanda for the wonderful opportunity to review this book! She sent me a beautiful hardcover copy and I have really enjoyed reading it! I also wanted to thank her for her patience. I have been so busy the last few months finishing up my masters program as well as traveling to England. My reading, reviewing, and blogging time has suffered. I am sorry! But I am done now, so I am free to pursue my true passion, Tudor books! Now for my review:
.
The Sisters Who Would be Queen: Mary, Katherine, and Lady Jane Grey by Leanda de Lisle–Book Review

As someone who has a bachelors in history, I have spent a lot of time reviewing non-fiction history books for classes. Despite having to read these non-fiction books for class, I do a lot of non-fiction reading for pleasure. I have made it through Weir’s, Fraser’s and even Starkey’s Six Wives of Henry VIII, as well as numerous other Tudor, French Revolution, and Romanov non-fiction. I usually prefer this non-fiction to fiction. Yes, I’m a nerd. However, The Sisters Who Would be Queen is a book for the nerds like me, but also a book for the majority of those who like fiction. It is written in an easy-to-read style, like most fiction, as well as full of facts for those non-fiction lovers. The subject matter is presented in a way to draw the reader into the world of the characters, much like a novel does.

Lady Jane Grey
There are many things I enjoyed about The Sisters Who Would be Queen. Many Tudor related books tend to start off great, focusing on the topic, then somehow ending up discussing Henry VIII and his wives or Elizabeth and her Golden Age. These are fascinating subjects, but should not be the central topic of every Tudor book. This book briefly discusses Henry VIII’s wives and Elizabeth, however I really liked that de Lisle didn’t dwell on them, rather used them as a familiar timeline to lay the foundations for her real subject matter, the Grey sisters.
The book is divided into four main parts: 1) Educating Jane, 2) Queen and Martyr, 3) Heirs to Elizabeth, and 4) Lost Love. Obviously the first two parts really focus on Jane Grey, her early life and eventual rise to the throne and subsequent swift fall. Throughout the first few chapters, de Lisle discusses Jane, Katherine, and Mary’s births and educations. Already I am intrigued. Yes, Jane Grey is a central figure, however de Lisle makes an effort to bring her sisters, Katherine and Mary, to the front. According to de Lisle, educating women had become quite fashionable while the three sisters were growing up. She goes into a lot of detail about their education, which I found extremely interesting! I won’t dwell on the section about Jane’s reign in this review, as most people are familiar with the story, however I did want to mention de Lisle’s view on Jane’s innocence in the plot to make her queen. According to de Lisle, “The Victorians produced innumerable prints depicting Jane modestly shrinking from the crown…But as Jane was signing herself ‘Jane the Quene’ on a daily basis, she wasn’t shrinking from the crown in any meaningful sense.” She also concludes that Jane really shines as a prisoner and as a victim of the axeman, rather than a queen. This is where she comes “into her own,” as a leader of the Protestant Reformation.

Lady Katherine Grey
Section Three, to me, is where the book really becomes interesting. True, de Lisle did a great job debunking many of the myths surrounding Jane, however I always enjoy learning about those figures who stood in the shadows, like Jane’s sisters. Part Three focuses on Katherine Grey, the middle sister. As the timeline continues, Mary is married to Phillip of Spain, has her “phantom pregnancies,” and eventually dies with Elizabeth succeeding her. Katherine, under Henry VIII’s will, is presumed heir, though Elizabeth snubs her and dissuades her council from considering it. She falls in love Edward “Ned” Seymour, Earl of Hertford and they marry without permission, despite the wrath that ensues from Elizabeth. Katherine and Hertford are imprisoned in the Tower for their marriage and eventually have two sons there. Katherine dies in 1568 of consumption at the age of 27, still “under arrest,” with her marriage annulled and her sons declared illegitimate. Leanda de Lisle gives an amazing recounting of this fascinating woman’s life. She defied her queen to marry the man she loved and spent the rest of her life in prison for it. de Lisle seems to think that Elizabeth feared Katherine as a potential rival. Her legitimacy was never in doubt (like Elizabeth’s) and she was able to produce two sons. Katherine had many, including Hale, promoting her as the rightful heir.
With Katherine’s death, the succession passed to Mary Grey, as does the last part of the book. However, de Lisle explains that because of Mary’s physical appearance she was never seriously considered as a contender for the throne. She was possibly a midget or had some sort of spinal deformity. However, like her sister Katherine, did marry and without the Queen’s permission. She, too, was placed under house arrest until the death of her husband. She never produced any children, which seemed to keep the Queen’s wrath at a low roar. Mary eventually returned to court and served Elizabeth as a maid of honor (a sign of Elizabeth not accepting Mary’s marriage). According to de Lisle, Mary kept her sister Jane’s memory close, owning a copy of Foxe’s Book of Martyrs. Strong and determined, like her sisters, Mary signed herself as “Mary Grey…Widow.” Though Elizabeth refused to accept her marriage, Mary kept it alive. To confirm de Lisle’s explanation of Elizabeth’s poor treatment of the Grey sisters, she proposes the example that upon Mary Grey’s death in 1578, the next “heir” to the throne, Margaret Clifford, Countess of Derby was arrested for hiring a magician to place spells on the queen. She was never freed from arrest.

Lady Mary Grey
Throughout the book, I really like how de Lisle interjects bits of history not centered on the sisters to keep the timeline on track. She discusses the sisters’ relevancy to these events, like the coronation of Edward VI and the reigns of Mary I and Elizabeth I, but also gives details not related to them, such as how Edward’s coronation was the first to have significant changes made to reveal the break with old Church rule as well as the fates of the children of Katherine Grey in the aftermath of Elizabeth’s death.
In her Epilogue, de Lisle discusses many of the myths surrounding Jane Grey, as well as literature and media related to the three sisters. Obviously Jane has the most, being romanticized in book and portrait. However, Mary has one book written about her, The Tablette Book of Lady Mary Keyes by Flora McDonald. It is a fictional memoir. The Stuarts, like Elizabeth, resented the Grey sisters’ line in the succession, so attempted to keep them out of the light. Despite this, the sisters’ stories are remembered. I think de Lisle sums it up best with her last words on the sisters: “The historical stories of the Grey sisters, stripped of literary debris, remain, meanwhile, as tragic and poignant as any fiction could make them….”
I give this book five out of five roses.

I thoroughly enjoyed reading it, much as I do novels. I found de Lisle’s writing style easy and fun to read. She included many facts, but with her writing style one did not feel bogged down by them. I also found her debunking of many of the myths surrounding Jane Grey fascinating, as well as hearing the stories of her sisters Katherine and Mary. They are in Jane’s shadow, but I feel that de Lisle did a fantastic job of bringing them to the forefront. That, to me, is the best part of the book.
.
Thank you again Leanda! I really loved your book and cannot wait to read your next one!
.
According to an e-mail I received from Leanda, she is currently working on “a dynastic history of the Tudors, told as one fluent story” due to be released in 2013. I can’t wait! I will post as more becomes available about it!